The IRS Exhibit Book

Exhibits should be provided in any correspondence to substantiate your position. This is especially important when dealing with the IRS. You may postulate a position; however, in order for it to be of any consequence, it would behoove you to include Exhibits as an offer of evidence of proof. Many people respond to an IRS letter quoting this statute or that law, yet fail to enclose a copy of the quoted law. This, I assert, constitutes a procedural error. Not only because you would be remiss to believe that any government employee is going to take the time to look up your citations or, for that matter, take you at your word, but mainly because you have offered nothing to support your conclusions.

The IRS Exhibit Book is a collection of over 400 pages of documentation to support just about every position known to oppose the illegal tactics of the Internal Revenue Service. When used in conjunction with the IRS Response Package the IRS Exhibit Book will be an invaluable tool in your quest for liberty from the IRS. It will be up to you to decide which exhibits are relevant to your particular situation. However, after taking almost three years to compile this collection, I feel it is imperative to have the evidence you will need at your fingertips. Consequently, this book is arranged by the source of the exhibit. You will find United States Codes in one section, Code of Federal Regulations in another, and so on.

Because the meaning and definitions of most words are different in Webster’s Dictionary than they are when used in law, definitions for various words from Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition are included for your edification below. Once you understand the distinction and difference between proof, evidence, exhibits, etc., you will be better able to use this compilation effectively.

Return to the Product List Page for more information or Go to the Order Form for ordering information. Thank you for your interest in this material. I trust it will serve you well.

Definitions from Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition

Exhibit, n. A paper or document produced and exhibited to a court during a trial or hearing, or to a commissioner taking depositions, or to auditors, arbitrators, etc., as a voucher, or in proof of facts, or as otherwise connected with the subject-matter, and which, on being accepted, is marked for identification and annexed to the deposition, report, or other principal document, or filed of record, or otherwise made part of the case.

Paper, document, chart, map, or the like, referred to and made a part of an affidavit, pleading or brief.

An item of physical/tangible evidence which is to be or has been offered to the court for inspection Evidence. Any species of proof, or probative matter, legally presented at the trial of an issue, by the act of the parties and through the medium of witnesses.

Exhibits may be included as a part of the appendix to appellate briefs. See Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, 30(e).

Evidence: Any species of proof, or probative matter, legally presented at the trial of an issue, by the act of the parties and through the medium of witnesses, records, documents, exhibits, concrete objects, etc., for the purpose of inducing belief in the minds of the court of jury as to their contention. Taylor v. Howard, 111 R.I. 527, 304 A.2d 891, 893

Testimony, writings, material objects, or other things presented to the senses that are offered to prove the existence or nonexistence of a fact. California Evidence Code.

Autoptic evidence: Type of evidence presented in court which consists of the thing itself and not the testimony accompanying its presentation. Articles offered in evidence which the judge or jury can see and inspect. Real evidence as contrasted with testimonial evidence; e.g. in contract action, the document purporting to be contract itself, or the gun in a murder trial.

Proof: The effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence. New England Newspaper Pub. Co. v. Bonner, C.C.A.Mass., 77 F.2d 915, 916. Any fact or circumstance which leads the mind to the affirmative or negative or any proposition. The conviction or persuasion of the mind of a judge or jury, by the exhibition of evidence, of the reality of a fact alleged. Ellis v. Wolfe-Shoemaker Motor Co., 227 Mo.App. 508, 55 S.W.2d 309

Evidence and Proof distinguished. Proof is the logically sufficient reason for assenting to the truth of a proposition advanced. In its juridical sense it is a term of wide import, and comprehends everything that may be adduced at a trial, within the legal rules, for the purpose of producing conviction in the mind of judge or jury, aside from mere argument. That is, everything that has a probative force intrinsically, and not merely as a deduction from, or combination of, original probative facts. But “evidence” is a narrower term, and includes only such kinds of proof as may be legally presented at a trial, by the act of the parties, and through the aid of such concrete facts as witnesses, records, or other documents. Thus, to urge a presumption of law in support of one’s case is adducing proof, but it is not offering evidence. “Belief” is a subjective condition resulting from proof. It is a conviction of the truth of a proposition, existing in the mind, and induced by persuasion, proof, or argument addressed to the judgment. Proof is the result or effect of evidence, while evidence is the medium or means by which a fact is proved or disproved, but the words “proof” and “evidence” may be used interchangeable. Proof is the perfection of evidence; for without evidence there is no proof, although there may be evidence which does not amount to proof; for example, if a man is found murdered at a spot where another has been seen walking but a short time before, this fact will be evidence to show that the latter was the murderer, but, standing alone, will be very far from proof of it.

This page has been visited times.